Legal Opinion

Barber v. Stromberg-Carlson Telephone Manufacturing Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1908No. 15,162PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from tbe district court for Franklin county: Ed L. Adams, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Calkins, C.

Tlie plaintiff brought action in the court below, alleging default in the performance of a contract in the words and figures following: “Memorandum of agreement made this 17th day of August, A. D. 1903, by and between Mr. F. W. Barber, of Franklin, Neb., party of the first part, and Stromberg-Carlson Telephone Manufacturing Company, party of the second part, witnesseth: The party of the first part shall use his best efforts and in fact secure for the party of the second part the contract for the central office apparatus and telephones for .the Home Telephone Co., of Grand Island,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. ConradNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Watkins v. BuggeNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Brong v. SpenceNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Coal River Collieries v. Eureka Coal & Wood Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  2. Howland v. Iron Fireman Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Howland v. Iron Fireman Mfg. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Tavlinsky v. Ringling Bros. CircusNebraska Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Monarch Portland Cement Co. v. P. J. Creedon & SonsNebraska Supreme Court · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API