Legal Opinion

Murvin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 11, 1981No. TT-273PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Murvin asserts that the trial court erred in refusing to classify her as a youthful offender as provided in Section 958.04(2), Florida Statutes (Supp.1978). The offense, however, took place prior to the effective date of the statute. Since the statute cannot be retroactively applied, the trial court’s imposition of sentence is AFFIRMED. Bradley v. State, 385 So.2d 1122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Allen v. State, 383 So.2d 674 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); State v. Pizarro, rev’d on reh., 383 So.2d 762 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).

MILLS, C. J., and BOOTH and LARRY G. SMITH, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. PizarroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  2. Bradley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Allen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Scotty's, Inc. v. JonesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Green v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982