Ewig v. Dutrow
Supreme Court of Virginia
Appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of Rocking-ham county. Decree for defendants. Complainants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtPrentis, J.
The petitioners filed their bill against J. Paul Dutrow and William B. Dutrow, alleging in substance that the Valley Hardware Company, Inc., having a maximum capital stock of $25,000, divided into 250 shares of the par value of $100 each, had since its formation been conducting a retail and wholesale hardware business; that on the 9th of May, 1917, there were outstanding 195 shares of such stock, 108 of which were owned by the defendants, both of whom were directors of the company, and-J. Paul Dutrow its manager and treasurer; that prior to said date there were negotiations between the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Root v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Hipp v. BabinSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
- Jones v. NewhallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Wilson v. HundleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1898
- Johnson v. SwankeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- CGI Federal Inc. v. FCi Federal, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2018
- Sacks v. TheodoreSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
- Ewing v. HaasSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
- Advanced Training Group Worldwide, Inc. v. Pro-Active Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2020
- CGI Federal Inc. v. FCi Federal, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.