Bloom v. Village of Buda
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heiple
The trial court denied the appellants’, Arvell and Barbara Barnett’s, section 2 — 611 motion for attorney fees from the plaintiff, Dora Bloom. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 110, par. 2 — 611.) The Barnetts appeal. We affirm.
On August 13, 1985, the plaintiff filed suit against the village of Buda, its mayor and board of trustees, and the Barnetts. The plaintiff asked for issuance of a writ of mandamus compelling the village to remove three trees from an alley abutting her property and compelling the village to require the Barnetts not to park their vehicles in the alley.
The Barnetts subsequently…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tower Oil & Technology Co. v. BuckleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Pole Realty Co. v. SorrellsIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Third Establishment, Inc. v. 1931 North Park ApartmentsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Kinsloe v. PogueIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- People ex rel. Wilson v. MottingerIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wren v. FeeneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988