Legal Opinion

Pasotex Pipe Line Co. v. Murray

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 22, 1948No. 12271PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEE, Circuit Judge.

This is the second appeal in this case. The first was from an order directing a verdict for the defendant, appellee then, appellant now. The facts are set forth in our previous opinion, 5 Cir., 161 F.2d 5. On that appeal three points were in issue, only one of which it was necessary for us to decide. Holding that under Texas law the Pasotex Pipe Line Company would have been liable for its employee Chenoweth’s negligence if in the exercise of reasonable care it should have known that he was an habitual drunkard, and that this issue should have been submitted to the jury, we…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Murray v. Pasotex Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mrs. Lois B. Nevels v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  2. Campus Sweater & Sportswear Co. v. M. B. Kahn Construction Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1979
  3. Har-Pen Truck Lines, Inc. v. Frederick Allen Mills, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  4. English v. MattsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  5. Pearson B. Garrett, Jr. v. Ellis Campbell, Jr., District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API