Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Human Services Department

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided November 26, 1991No. 12444Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINZNER, Judge.

Mother appeals the children’s court's termination of her parental rights. Father’s appeal was previously dismissed while this case was assigned to the summary calendar, and he is not a party to this appeal. Mother contends on appeal that the children’s court erred in allowing testimony from Dr. Herman Brock, mother’s treating psychologist, because the information was protected under the psychotherapist-patient privilege contained in SCRA 1986, 11-504. The Human Services Department (HSD) argues that mother failed to preserve the issues argued on appeal. We agree with HSD…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Woolwine v. Furr's, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Matter of Parental Rights of PPWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. CarltonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. WilliamsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API