Legal Opinion

Behrens v. Hironimus

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided November 8, 1948No. 5765PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOBIE, Circuit Judge.

The proceedings in this case prior to the first appeal to us are set out in our opinion in this first appeal, Behrens v. Hironimus, 4 Cir., 166 F.2d 245. These need not be repeated here.

We held, in that opinion, that plaintiff’s application for habeas corpus did make out a prima facie case, the judgment of the District Court was reversed and the case was remanded to the District Court “with instructions to issue the writ of habeas corpus, hear the evidence, determine whether or not the allegations of the petition are true and for such further proceedings as the ends of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Goddard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
  3. Behrens v. HironimusCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
  4. Woodrum v. PriceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Edward E. Colton and Lillian Kaltman v. United States of America, United States of America v. Edward E. ColtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  2. Baird v. KoernerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  3. In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  4. Lora v. Board of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1977
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. E. Bruce HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API