Nome State Bank v. Brendmoen
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.
This is. an action to foreclose a chattel mortgage. The plaintiff is the mortgagee and the defendants aré the mortgagors. The defendants demurred to the plaintiff’s complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The court overruled the demurrer and the defendants appealed.
Two issues were presented to the trial court. First, whether the complaint alleges in sufficient terms that a copy of the chattel mortgage was delivered to the mortgagors at the time of execution. Second, does the failure of the complaint to allege surrender of a copy of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smith v. City CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Wood v. KreppsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- State ex rel. Prchal v. DaileySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- Lankford v. First National Bank of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping Machine Co. v. LeeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dixon v. KaufmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
- In Re Township 143 North, Range 55 West, in Cass CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
- Anderson v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Anderson v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996