Legal Opinion

Mahroofa I. Khan v. City and County of San Francisco

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 30, 2026No. 3:24-cv-09289Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MAHROOFA I. KHAN, Case No. 24-cv-09289-LJC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 v. AMEND COMPLAINT IN PART 10 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN Re: Dkt. Nos. 50, 65 FRANCISCO, 11 Defendant. 12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Mahroofa Khan’s motion for leave to file an amended 13 complaint. This matter is suitable for resolution without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the 14 following reasons, Plaintiff’s request to amend her complaint and proceed using the revised 15 amended complaint at ECF No. 65 is GRANTED. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Edward G. Eldridge v. Sherman BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Christopher Owens Cynthia Hutchins,plaintiffs-Appellants v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan,inc., a California Corporation,defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant/appellant v. Frank Rose Clive "Sonny" Miller, Defendants-Counter-Plaintiffs/appelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API