Sequeira v. KB HOME
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KEITH P. ELLISON, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. No. 33.) After considering the parties’ filings, all responses and replies thereto, and the applicable law, the Court finds that Defendants’ Motion should be denied.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Plaintiffs Employment with KB Home Houston
Plaintiff Victor Sequeira alleges that he was wrongfully terminated by Defendant KB Home Houston for engaging in activities protected under Section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which provides whistleblower protection. On August 16, 2006, Plaintiff began…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Eason v. ThalerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Crawford v. Formosa Plastics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Darlie Kee Darin Routier v. City of Rowlett Texas Jimmy Ray Patterson Chris Frosch Greg Davis, Assistant District Attorney for Dallas CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ashmore v. CGI Group Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Biggins v. Northern Ohio Medical Specialists, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024
- Edwards v. First Trust Portfolios LPDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2025