Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Southern Ry. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia

Decided January 19, 1900No. 994PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity.

1Opinion of the Court

AEWMAV, District Judge.

This case is now heard on exceptions by both parties to the report of the special master. The usual rule as to the weight to be attached to the report of a master in chancery is that it is presumed to be correct, and that it will not be set aside unless clearly and manifestly erroneous. Additional weight is given such a report when the reference is by consent of parties. In this case, while the order of reference recites that it is by consent of parties, it is claimed (and such is probably the fact) that the consent was with reference to the person selected as special…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kimberly v. ArmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Davis v. SchwartzSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Farrar v. BernheimCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1896
  4. Walters v. Western & A. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia · 1895

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Murphy v. Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API