Griffith v. Sellers
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.
“This case is controlled by the well settled rule, that where it does not appear that the verdict was demanded under the law and the evidence, the first grant of a new trial will not be disturbed, though based on a specified ground of the motion, .without regard to the merit of such ground. Smith v. Hightower, 123 Ga. 110 (51 S. E. 28).” Atlantic & Birmingham R. Co. v. Cobb, 125 Ga. 121 (53 S. E. 591). “This court will not closely scrutinize the facts in evidence or endeavor to balance with great exactness the testimony on both sides with a view to detecting an abuse of discretion by the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smith v. HightowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Atlantic & Birmingham Railway Co. v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Georgia Midland & Gulf Railroad v. CurrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
3Cited by6 opinions
- Moody v. MoodySupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Baker v. McGarrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- D. H. Overmyer Warehouse Co. v. W. C. Caye & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- D. H. Overmyer Warehouse Co. v. W. C. Caye & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Jones v. J. S. H. CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.