Legal Opinion

Wenberg v. A Cargo of Mineral Phosphate

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 19, 1883PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Admiralty.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This libel was filed as “a cause of possession, civil and maritime,” against a cargo of mineral phosphate on board the bark Busy, and against James C. Jewitt. The ninth allegation asserts that “all and singular the premises in tlie libel contained are within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the court.” The respondent, Jewitt, has answered separately, and in general terms has denied the jurisdiction of the court. Some testimony has been taken in the cause, but no previous exception to the libel, for want of jurisdiction, was taken. A motion is now made to dismiss the libel for want…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mayor v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  2. Eber B. Ward, Survivor, &C., Owner of the Steamboat Detroit v. Charles ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
  3. Cutler v. RaeSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
  4. Hornthall v. CollectorSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  5. Andrews v. Essex Fire & Marine Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1822

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hunt v. a Cargo of Petroleum Products Laden on Steam Tanker HildaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Chirurg v. Knickerbocker Steam Towage Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1909
  3. Graham v. Oregon R. & Nav. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1905
  4. Nellie T.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
  5. Garcia v. GarciaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API