Legal Opinion

Adams v. Benderson Development Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 30, 1994PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred insofar as it denied the motion of 1210 Colvin Avenue, Inc. (defendant) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Defendant established, as a matter of law, that it was plaintiff’s employer (see, Perez v Tru-Fit Mfg. Co., 152 AD2d 461, 463). An employee may not bring a common-law action against her employer in its capacity as the owner of property where a job-related injury occurred (Billy v Consolidated Mach. Tool Corp., 51 NY2d 152, 158; Jackson…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Billy v. Consolidated Machine Tool Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Jackson v. Tivoli Towers Housing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Perez v. Tru-Fit Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Riggins v. StongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API