Legal Opinion

Bowen v. Kirkland

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 6, 1897Published

Error from Hill. Tried below before Hon. J. M. Hall.

1Opinion

FINLEY, Chief Justice.

We have thoroughly considered the questions involved in this case, and see no reason to 'change the disposition we have heretofore made of it; the motion f>or rehearing will therefore be overruled.

Counsel for the motion say that in the opinion rendered the court does not express its views upon the proposition urged by them, that the doctrine of lis pendens applies to the purchase of the land from the heir during the pendency of the litigation between such heir and the administrator, and they ask us to give a reason why the principle does not apply.

In our judgment, lis…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Griffith v. GriffithNew York Court of Chancery · 1839

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API