Bayha, Barber, & List v. Mumford
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Barton District Court. Hon.° J. H. Bailey, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJohnston, J.
This was an action in the nature of a creditor’s bill, in which the honesty and validity of certain transactions and transfers, had and made between the Kansas City Times Company, Morrison Mumford, Chas. E. Hasbrook, J. K. McLain, and others incidentally connected with them, were challenged. The trial court found the transactions to be free from fraud and the transfers to be valid. It is argued here that the findings are without support; but after reading the testimony we readily conclude that there is some testimony, indeed considerable testimony, .tend*446ing to sustain the findings of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wilson v. HoltSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- Hatcher v. . RocheleauNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Flournoy v. WardenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853
- Campbell v. WallaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ayers v. RatsheskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- People v. ReeseNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Sharp v. SharpIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
- Boyd v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- Jacobs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.