Legal Opinion

Noyes v. McLaflin

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1872PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Wbit of Ebbob to the Circuit Court of Coles Comity; the Hon. A. J. Gallagheb, Judge, presiding. This was an action of debt upon an arbitration bond executed by E. Noyes, principal, and Hiram Cox, his security, to E. McLaflin. The bond recited that, whereas, the said E. Noyes and E. McLaflin have entered into an agreement to arbitrate, etc.

Read the full summary

Wbit of Ebbob to the Circuit Court of Coles Comity; the Hon. A. J. Gallagheb, Judge, presiding. This was an action of debt upon an arbitration bond executed by E. Noyes, principal, and Hiram Cox, his security, to E. McLaflin. The bond recited that, whereas, the said E. Noyes and E. McLaflin have entered into an agreement to arbitrate, etc. The declaration in reference to this part of the bond alleged that the said plaintiff and the said defendants, described in said bond and the condition thereunder written, entered into an agreement to arbitrate. On the trial the bond was objected to on the…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

This was an action of debt, brought by the defendant in error on an arbitration bond against the plaintiff in error and Hiram Cox, his security on the bond.

In the declaration the bond is declared on according to its legal effect, and then the condition thereunder written is set out in hcec verba, together with the original and supplemental ¿greements between the parties to submit all matters in dispute between them to the arbitrament of James A. Eads. So much of the award made by the arbitrator as shows that a money award was made in favor of the defendant in error is set out in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hofferbert v. KlinkhardtIllinois Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tucker v. PageIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Habberton v. HabbertonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API