Pinewood Homes, Inc. v. Harris
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWynn, Judge
I concur with that portion of the majority opinion that affirms the trial court’s denial of Plaintiff’s motion to amend their complaint. However, because I find that the timing of Plaintiffs’ complaint for tortious interference makes it a collateral attack on the preliminary injunction sought by Defendants, I would affirm the trial court’s dismissal of that cause of action. Additionally, after reviewing Plaintiffs’ original complaint for abuse of process, I conclude they failed to allege any facts that would support a claim of abuse of process. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.
*609I.
As noted by…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Oates v. Jag, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Childress v. AbelesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Isenhour v. HuttoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.