Legal Opinion

General Dynamics Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 8, 1977No. 21-76PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBennett, Judge

This action for patent infringement requires us to decide whether an unappealed decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (the board) against the Government on the existence of a license to use a patent under the standard Patent Rights clause of a Government contract now precludes the Government from raising the license as a defense to the alleged infringement. The Government says that the decision does not preclude it, arguing that the board’s ruling was purely advisory and therefore not binding on it under S&E Contractors, Inc. v. United States, 406 U.S. 1 (1972). We conclude…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. United States v. Anthony Grace & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission v. Washington National ArenaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. In The Matter Of Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul And Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  3. Md.-Nat'l Cap. P. & P. v. Wash. Nat'l ArenaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  4. Marco Holding Co. v. Lear Siegler, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
  5. Robishaw Engineering, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API