Legal Opinion · Dissent

Floreck v. Citibank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 11, 1986Published

1DissentCallahan, J.

(dissenting.) I would reserve decision and remit

for a hearing. Although presented with stipulated facts upon which to resolve the issue of the special sewer district assessments, the court should not have ignored the standing of the plaintiff. The record indicates that prior to its determination, the court was informed that plaintiffs had purchased tax sale certificates for the years 1977, 1978 and 1979. Since the plaintiff held outstanding tax sale certificates from prior years on the subject property, a civil action against defendant was precluded (Village of Spring Val. v Empire Natl.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of UeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. In re the Accounting of Lincoln-Rochester Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1946
  3. Canino v. EngelsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Village of Spring Valley v. Empire National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API