Legal Opinion

McGuinness v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1962PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLester Holtzman, J.

In an action for a declaratory judgment that the plaintiff Thomas McGuinness is an “ insured person ” within the meaning of the New York Automobile Accident Indemnification Endorsement to a certain policy of automobile liability insurance, the plaintiffs move for summary judgment. (See, also, Matter of McGuinness [MVAIC], 32 Misc 2d 949.)

It is admitted that the Hanover Insurance Company issued to the plaintiff Theodore Fereance a New York family combination automobile policy with the New York Automobile Accident Indemnification Endorsement and that this policy was in full force and effect…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance v. PassalacquaNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  2. In re the Arbitration between McGuinness & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Kessler v. Cosmopolitan Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Tolson v. National Provident UnionNew York Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Tolson v. . National Provident UnionNew York Court of Appeals · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Frost Ex Rel. Anderson v. WhitbeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Allstate Insurance v. Chia-I LungNew York Supreme Court · 1986
  3. In re the Arbitration between McGuinness & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Cabrera v. Atlantic National InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Frost Ex Rel. Anderson v. WhitbeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API