McGuinness v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLester Holtzman, J.
In an action for a declaratory judgment that the plaintiff Thomas McGuinness is an “ insured person ” within the meaning of the New York Automobile Accident Indemnification Endorsement to a certain policy of automobile liability insurance, the plaintiffs move for summary judgment. (See, also, Matter of McGuinness [MVAIC], 32 Misc 2d 949.)
It is admitted that the Hanover Insurance Company issued to the plaintiff Theodore Fereance a New York family combination automobile policy with the New York Automobile Accident Indemnification Endorsement and that this policy was in full force and effect…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance v. PassalacquaNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- In re the Arbitration between McGuinness & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1962
- Kessler v. Cosmopolitan Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- Tolson v. National Provident UnionNew York Supreme Court · 1908
- Tolson v. . National Provident UnionNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Frost Ex Rel. Anderson v. WhitbeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Allstate Insurance v. Chia-I LungNew York Supreme Court · 1986
- In re the Arbitration between McGuinness & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1963
- Cabrera v. Atlantic National InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Frost Ex Rel. Anderson v. WhitbeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002