Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Garman

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 9, 2024No. 1:19-cv-02227Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JAMIL COOPER, : Plaintiff : No. 1:19-cv-02227 : v. : (Judge Kane) : MARK GARMAN, et al., : Defendants : MEMORANDUM Before the Court for resolution is the issue of whether the remaining defendants—i.e., Defendants Kauert, Muthler, and Walters (collectively, “Defendants”)—have met their burden to establish the affirmative defense of Plaintiff Jamil Cooper (“Plaintiff”)’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”) before commencing this action in federal court.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Ross v. BlakeSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API