Legal Opinion

McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. McKee

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1883PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Kalamazoo. (Mills, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring' error.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

Tbe plaintiff, a foreign corporation organized under tbe laws of the state of Illinois, on the 13th day of December, 1880, and for a long time previous thereto, was doing business in the village of Kalamazoo. During said period one Solomon L. Beardsley acted as general agent for, and conducted the business of, said plaintiff at Kalamazoo, which was selling agricultural implements and machinery manufactured by them; and during the same period said Beardsley, John C. Bloom and said defendant John McKee, Jr., entered into a copartnership for the purpose of selling agricultural implements in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Putnam v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  2. Burson v. HuntingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carmichael v. Schaefer Heights Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API