Legal Opinion

State v. Jones

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 30, 1940PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtManser, J.

Upon completion of the evidence in the trial of the respondents upon an indictment charging them with lewd and lascivious cohabitation, and the charge of the presiding justice, the following exceptions were taken:

“The respondents object to the whole charge as it is an argument for the State instead of a statement of the law.
“That the charge was prejudicial to the rights of the respondents.”

Exceptions such as these have been characterized as serving only as a dragnet with the apparent hope that something might be brought to.light and made use of as a valid cause of complaint. State v. Reed, 62…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McKown v. PowersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1894
  2. State v. DaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1887
  3. State v. RichardsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1893
  4. Jameson v. WeldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1899
  5. York v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1891

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. DipietrantonioSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1956
  2. Desmond v. WilsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1948
  3. State v. TownsendSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1950
  4. State v. BachelderSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  5. State v. EngstromSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API