Legal Opinion

Ottawa Gas Light & Coke Co v. Graham

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1862PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

On the trial below, appellant offered to prove how much it would cost to obtain a supply of good water, by purchasing a right from the water company; or by the construction of a cistern. The court refused to permit the introduction of this evidence, and that decision is assigned as one of the errors on this record. If the erection of the gas works produced injury to appellee’s well, and polluted the water, he has the undoubted right to recover a sum sufficient to cover any loss he has thereby sustained. The company has the right to so use their franchise as to produce no injury to the rights…

2Cited by27 opinions

  1. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. LoebIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  2. State v. PikeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1870
  3. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. WachterIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. MaherIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Barnard v. SherleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API