Williams ex rel. Raymond v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.

RANDOLPH, Justice,

specially concurring:

¶ 34. I write separately to reject the dissents’ attempt unreasonably to expand and stretch the parameters of the “circle of reasonable foreseeability” (Mauney v. Gulf Refining Co., 193 Miss. 421, 9 So.2d 780, 781 (1942)), and to contravene the doctrine of stare decisis by denuding a thirty-three-year-old decision (Robinson v. Howard Brothers of Jackson, Inc., 372 So.2d 1074 (Miss.1979)), while disclaiming an attempt to overrule same.

¶35. Preliminarily, neither I nor the Mississippi Legislature can subscribe to Presiding Justice Dickinson’s overarching…