Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Phillip R. Smith

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 2000No. 79S00-9910-DI-605Published

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

While his client remained incarcerated by order of one court, the respondent, Phillip R. Smith, improperly obtained from another court an order releasing his client. Today we approve a Conditional Agreement between the respondent and the Disciplinary Commission, submitted pursuant to Ind. Admission and Discipline Rule 23(11), and calling for a public reprimand of the respondent.

Having been admitted to the bar of this state in 1978, the respondent is subject to our disciplinary jurisdiction.

The Commission and the respondent agree that the respondent's client was under house…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of MullinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. In Re WarrumIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In Re JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API