People v. Owusu
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that reversal is mandated because Supreme Court failed to strike the testimony of a witness after he invoked his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. Because defendant neither objected to nor moved to strike that testimony, his contention has not been preserved for our review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Kaufman, 156 AD2d 718, 719, lv denied 76 NY2d 737). In any event, striking that testimony was not warranted because the invocation of the Fifth Amendment privilege concerned crimes that did not pertain to the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. RiveraNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. RoopchandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. RubinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. SalkoNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. FernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. FaethAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.