People v. Teeter
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed. Memorandum: The court submitted to the jury the question whether Officers Cantaben and Cotsworth were members of a conspiracy to kill the two intended victims. At the close of its instruction relating to the existence of an overt act, the court charged that if the jury found that these officers were not conspirators but that Teeter and Kropman were, and if the jury found that money was paid to Officer Cantaben by Kropman for the purpose of having the victims killed, then the payment of money would constitute an overt act and the crime would be complete. The charge was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. HinesNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- People v. BauerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- People v. HinesNew York Supreme Court · 1938
- People v. HinesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. MenacheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- People v. LakomecAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. OrtizAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. LanniNew York Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. WisanNew York Supreme Court · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.