Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh National Bank v. C. I. Mortgage Group

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County

Decided December 3, 1976No. 2393Published

1Opinion of the Court

HESTER, J.,

Presently before the court is defendant’s motion to cancel bond and discharge the principal and surety on said bond in the above entitled action in foreign attachment.

Defendant alleges in the instant motion that plaintiff, Pittsburgh National Bank, instituted this action in foreign attachment by attaching certain of defendant’s mortgages through the then viable Pennsylvania Foreign Attachment Procedure; thereafter on March 11, 1975, the attached property was released when defendant, C. I. Mortgage Group, as principal, and the Home Indemnity Company of Manchester, New Hampshire, as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RoyallSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. United States v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. United States v. John Fioravanti, Nicholas Panaccione, and Angelo Pepe, Nicholas PanaccioneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  5. Marion Domeracki v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API