Legal Opinion

Turner v. Dinwiddie

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 26, 1925No. 8PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PANNILU, O. J.

This is an action to try title. The parties will be designated as in the trial court. The defendants are E. N. Dinwiddie and Mrs. J. T. Urban, who was formerly Miss E. M. Dinwiddie. This litigation grew out of the controversy over a deed executed by J. C. Watkins and wife, dated February 3, 1914. Plaintiffs claim that said deed was executed to E. N. Dinwiddie as grantee and deraigned title under an execution sale against him. Defendants claim that said conveyance was to E. M. Dinwiddie, now" Mrs. Urban, as grantee.

In answer to special issues submitted un'der the pleadings, the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Koppelmann v. KoppelmannTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Cole v. NobleTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Baker v. FogleTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Smith v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Baker v. FogleTexas Supreme Court · 1920

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Atkins v. DoddsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  2. Gordon v. McIntoshCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Bell v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Somer v. Bogart, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  5. Estep v. BrattonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API