Legal Opinion

Kavanaugh v. Colombo

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 28, 1939PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

These are two actions of tort arising out of the collision of two automobiles, one driven by Lee F. Kavanaugh, and the other by the defendant. In the first case, damages are sought by said Kavanaugh, through his father as next friend, for personal injuries, and for property damage to his automobile. In the other case the father seeks to recover for his alleged consequential damages resulting from the injury to his son. The only question relates to the exclusion of evidence.

At the trial, a witness called by the plaintiffs was asked on direct examination if he heard the defendant make a state*380men…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ryerson v. Inhabitants of AbingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Stowe v. MasonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Gorham v. MoorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  4. Commonwealth v. TurnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  5. Grebenstein v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. McAfeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  2. Agoos Leather Companies, Inc. v. American & Foreign InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  3. Commonwealth v. ConnollyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  4. Desmond v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  5. Commonwealth v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API