Legal Opinion

Middleton v. Ballingall

California Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1851PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the superior court of the city of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. The judgment of the court below was rendered in favor of the defendants.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Bennett, J.

I shall not consider whether the power of attorney from the defendants to Bell, authorized the contract upon which this suit is founded, inasmuch as I think the action cannot be sustained on the contract itself. The defendants stipulate to sell to the plaintiffs certain merchandise shipped from Batavia, in the island of Java, for the port of San Francisco, and both parties agree that the contract shall be considered as binding until the arrival of the ship. The ship has never arrived.

The sale was not an absolute and unconditional sale of the property. Even had the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Russell v. NicollNew York Supreme Court · 1829

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Blanc v. KlumpkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API