Legal Opinion

Duncan v. Randolph

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 19, 1999No. A98A2071PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Judge.

Angela Duncan and JoAnn Mosley brought suit against Robert Keith Randolph to recover for injuries allegedly caused by a collision between the vehicles driven by Duncan and Randolph. The case was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of Randolph. Duncan and Mosley’s motion for new trial was denied, and they appeal. We find no error and affirm.

In their sole enumeration of error, Duncan and Mosley contend that in denying their motion for new trial, the trial court failed to exercise its discretion. They argue it is apparent that no discretion was exercised because…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Central Anesthesia Associates, P.C. v. WorthySupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  2. Nalley Northside Chevrolet, Inc. v. HerringCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. Clark v. United Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  4. Williams v. CalhounCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  2. Hite v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  3. Wilson v. J & L MELTON, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  4. Butts v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. Levine v. ChoiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API