Legal Opinion

United States v. Rose

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 17, 1964No. Civ. A. No. 33335PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

This is a civil action brought under 31 U.S.C. § 192 to enforce the personal liability of the defendants, who are administrators of the estate of Morton M. Rose, and their surety, for a federal estate tax assessed against the estate. The section of the law in question provides, in substance, that an administrator who pays any debt owing by his decedent before he pays debts of the decedent due the United States shall be answerable personally to the United States to the extent of such payments.

On February 12, 1953, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue assessed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. UpdikeSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. United States v. WeisburnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. United States v. MotsingerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
  4. United States v. BirnsDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1963

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. BushlowDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993
  2. United States v. Westchester Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API