Legal Opinion

Hoyle v. Wilson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1988Published

1Opinion

OPINION ON PETITION TO REHEAR

DROWOTA, Justice.

The State of Tennessee has filed a Petition to Rehear pursuant to Rule 39, T.R. A.P. The Petition does not seek a reconsideration of the holding in this case, conceding that the opinion correctly states the law in Tennessee, but asks the Court to clarify some of the implications of the opinion. We continue to adhere to the views set out in the opinion but find it necessary to address one of the State’s contentions.

One of the issues raised by the state concerns the Court’s construction of URESA in Section II of the opinion. The State asks that we…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Moffat v. MoffatCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State Ex Rel. Department of Social Services v. WrightTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Ray v. PentlickiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  4. Olson v. OlsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. State Ex Rel. Arvayo v. GuerreroCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API