Walker v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harrison
Thelma Walker (Walker), plaintiff and appellant, brought this action alleging lack of good faith and unfair practices on the part of St. Paul Fire and Marine (St. Paul) in the negotiation and settlement of a legal malpractice claim against its insured. The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of defendant St. Paul, holding that St. Paul had reasonable grounds to deny coverage for Walker’s claim against its insured, and therefore St. Paul did not lack good faith in its dealings with Walker. We reverse.
The issues presented by the appellant are:
1. Did the District Court err in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dare v. Montana Petroleum Marketing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1984
- Peschel v. JonesMontana Supreme Court · 1988
- Walker v. LarsonMontana Supreme Court · 1986
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lorang v. Fortis InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- Dees v. American National Fire InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1993
- Shilhanek v. D-2 Trucking, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
- Eott Energy Operating Ltd. Partnership v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of LondonDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1999
- Boulder Monitor v. Jefferson High School District No. 1Montana Supreme Court · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.