City of Overland Park v. Rhodes
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1DissentAtcheson, J.
Based on the City of Overland Park’s representation that its primary purpose for conducting the motor vehicle checkpoint entailed publicizing par*68ticular opinions and views about driving and alcohol use, I would find the exercise violated the First and Fourth Amendment rights of Defendant Kelly Rhodes and the 600 other drivers who were waylaid. A state or local government cannot use its police powers to create captive audiences as a means of educating or advocating on particular subjects or issues no matter how popular or benign the message. The implications of a contrary rule would be both…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.