Legal Opinion

Frentress v. Markle

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 15, 1850PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Dubuque District Gourt.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion ly

GeeeNe, J.

Proceedings commenced by scire facias again John W. Maride, to make him a party to a judgment rendered against his former partner E. Mat-tox, on their joint note executed to the plaintiff.

*554It appears of record in the case, that in 1839, Mattox and Markle were partners as merchants, and being indebted to E. Erentess, they executed their joint note for the payment of one thousand dollars. Before the note became due, the partnership was dissolved, and it was stipulated that Mattox should -take the goods and credits and pay the debts of the firm. A few months after this…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Russell v. LytleNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  2. Dean v. SpeakmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1844
  3. Watkinson v. Inglesby & StokesNew York Supreme Court · 1810
  4. Dillingham v. EstillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1835
  5. Woodruff v. DobbinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1845

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Same v. SameSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API