Legal Opinion

City of Hammond v. Doody

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 26, 1990No. 45A03-8904-CV-144PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Presiding Judge.

Defendant-appellant City of Hammond, Indiana appeals the trial court’s judgment permanently enjoining the City of Hammond from enforcement of Ordinance 6045 against Michael E. Doody, d/b/a Flower Express.

The facts relevant to this appeal disclose that on April 28, 1987, the City of Hammond enacted Ordinance 6045 prohibiting outdoor retail sales in commercially zoned districts. Doody, who has an outdoor flower sales business, challenged the ordinance by filing a complaint in Lake Circuit Court. He alleged in his complaint that the ordinance was unconstitutional and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kavanagh v. ButoracIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Freson v. CombsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Corey v. Smith CaseIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
  4. State Ex Rel. Rose v. Hoffman, JudgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
  5. State Ex Rel. McGonigle v. Madison Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Samsara Memorial Trust v. Kelly, Remmel & Zimmerman Kelly, Remmel & Zimmerman v. Raisin Memorial TrustSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API