Legal Opinion

Sordo v. Camblin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 22, 2014No. 3D13-353PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRothenberg, J.

This appeal arises from the trial court’s modification of the parties’ timesharing plan. Because the trial court’s failure to make specific findings in the final order was not raised in the appellant’s motion for rehearing, and the trial court’s order is supported by competent substantial evidence, we affirm.

The parties, Ellen Sordo (“the mother”) and Gerard Joseph Camblin (“the father”) have been engaged in a highly contentious child custody dispute for over five years since their marriage was dissolved in October 2008. Both parties petitioned the trial court for modification of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wade v. HirschmanSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  2. PENSACOLA BEACH PIER, INC. v. KingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. Hentze v. DenysDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  4. McKinnon v. StaatsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. ADRIANA MONICA MENDOZA v. TOMAS CURBELODistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021
  2. GREGORY ROBERTS v. ANYZEILA DIAZDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022
  3. Jessica Toledano v. Daniel AlvarezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026
  4. KATHLEEN MARY OLIVER v. MARIANO JUAN OLIVERDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022
  5. Susanna Alan v. Roger WestDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API