Legal Opinion

Miller v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided February 13, 1934No. Docket Nos. 60689, 60690Published

Where, by a contract between a corporation and the stockholders of another corporation, the first corporation acquired all of the stock of the second, three fourths for cash and one fourth by exchange for a minority interest of its own stock, held, there was no reorganization within the meaning of section 112(i)(1) of the Revenue Act of 1928.

1Opinion of the Court

A. L. MILLER, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

IDA W. HAWK, EXECUTRIX, ESTATE OF HENRY C. HAWK, DECEASED, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Miller v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 60689, 60690.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

29 B.T.A. 1061; 1934 BTA LEXIS 1426;

February 13, 1934, Promulgated

Where, by a contract between a corporation and the stockholders of another corporation, the first corporation acquired all of the stock of the second, three fourths for cash and one fourth by exchange for a minority interest of its own stock, held, there was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Miller v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API