Legal Opinion

Bell v. Siemens & Halske Electric Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for. Sauk county: John E. Bennett, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Cassoday, 0. J.

This action is to recover compensation for services rendered at the special instance and request of the defendant between January 1,1891, and March 30,1891, in procuring and inducing the Baraboo Gas & Electric Light Company, located at Baraboo, where the plaintiff resided, to purchase certain electrical machinery and appliances from the defendant. The defendant answered by way of admissions, denials, and counter allegations. At the close of the testimony on behalf of the plaintiff, the trial court granted a nonsuit, and from the judgment entered thereon the plaintiff brings…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stewart v. MatherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Orton v. ScofieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Hiltz v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  4. McKenzie v. LegoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wolverton v. TuttleOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Averill v. O'FarrellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Burdon v. BriqueletWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API