Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Lake Canal Co. of Colo.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided December 3, 1981No. 79CA0939PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge.

Plaintiffs, Clovis and Lyal Nelson, sought a mandatory injunction to compel defendants, Lake Canal Company and its officers, to provide irrigation water in excess of the company’s regulation limiting water deliveries to four days per week. The trial court granted the injunction, but ordered plaintiffs to pay the company for the cost of providing water on the fifth day. Plaintiffs appeal the trial court’s denial of their claims for damages and costs. Plaintiffs also argue that the Lake Canal Company is a carrier ditch, without authority to set the fee for providing the extra…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Colorado Potato Flake & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  2. Jacobucci v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  3. Billings Ditch Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  4. Bloxsom v. San Luis Valley Crop Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  5. City and County of Denver v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. East Ridge of Fort Collins, LLC v. Larimer & Weld Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  2. Bruckman v. Parliament Escrow Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. High Plains A & M, LLC v. Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  4. Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District v. Fort Lyon Canal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  5. City of Westminster v. City of BroomfieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API