Legal Opinion

Connally v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided July 30, 1992No. 13-91-385-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FEDERICO G. HINOJOSA, Jr., Justice.

A jury found appellant guilty of indecency with a child. Appellant elected to have the trial court assess punishment and pleaded true to the enhancement allegation of a prior felony conviction for indecency with a child. The trial court found the enhancement allegation to be true and assessed punishment at ten years’ confinement. By a single point of error, appellant complains that the trial court erred by denying him the right to cross-examine the victim concerning her previous sexual activity. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

A person commits…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wicker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. Ramos v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991
  3. Wicker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
  4. Golden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Stiles, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1997
  2. Riley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
  3. Ex Parte Timothy Lee Stiles, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1997
  4. Paul Alan Riley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
  5. in the Interest of D.A.M., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API