Prugh v. Hughel
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By THE COURT:
Submitted on motion of defendant-appellee to dismiss the appeal on the ground that appellant has failed to comply with the requirements of Rule VII and that the order appealed from is not a ñnai order.
On November 18, 1948, the appellant gave notice of intention to appeal on questions of law. More than fifty days have elapsed and the record shows that appellant has failed to file assignments of error, briefs and bill of exceptions. The motion will be sustained for failure to comply with the provisions of Rule VII.
The order appealed from is specifically designated as the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mahaffey v. StineOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
- Hauck v. HauckOhio Court of Appeals · 1939
- Covington Building & Loan Ass'n v. YostOhio Court of Appeals · 1940
- Martin v. New York Central Rd. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1940