Legal Opinion
Coleman v. Block
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided October 28, 1983No. Civ. No. A1-83-47PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VAN SICKLE, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in this action have moved for leave to file an amended class action complaint. The amended complaint would expand the scope of the class from a state*706wide class to a national class, with the exception of those states where state-wide class action motions are pending or have been certified. According to counsel, statewide class actions have been requested or certified in the States of Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Kansas, Minnesota and Mississippi.
I have already found that the state-wide class action qualifies under Rule 23 of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Coleman v. BlockDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1983
3Cited by14 opinions
- Coleman v. EspyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Coleman v. BlockDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1984
- United States v. Randall O. HintzmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Coleman v. BlockDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1983
- Hagemeier v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.