Legal Opinion

Tulsa Junior College v. Urban Design Group, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided January 24, 2000No. 93,332PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSEN, Vice-Chief Judge:

T 1 Garnishee/Appellant, Odyssey Re (London) Limited ("Odyssey"), seeks review of the trial court's order holding Odyssey's amended garnishment answer ineffectual, de*235nying its application to interplead, and granting judgment to Plaintiff/Appellee, Tulsa Community College1 ("TCC"), for $798,740.00 on the garnishment. TCC served a garnishment affidavit on Odyssey to collect on its judgment against Standard Testing and Engineering Company ("Standard"). Odyssey answered on November 16, 1998, stating, "That of a 1 million dollar policy $201,260.00 has been paid and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Prough v. Edinger, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  3. Culie v. ArnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  4. Helms v. State Ex Rel. MifflinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Farmer's Exchange Bank of Antlers v. DennisCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Roads West, Inc. v. AustinCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API