In Re Roberts' Estate
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Respondent moves to dismiss the first appeal on the ground that Milton Louis Roberts was an adverse party and should have been served with the notice of appeal, notwithstanding the fact that he had not appeared and taken any part in the proceedings from which the judgment appealed from was entered. The petition filed by respondent to terminate the trusts was one in probate filed under the authority of section 10352, Revised Codes of 1921. Proceedings under this section, like all other proceedings in probate, are proceedings in rem and not inpersonam. (Security-First National Bank v. Superior…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Security-First National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Hooven, Owens & Rentschler, Co. v. John Featherstone's SonsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Adams v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Keating v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Merk v. Bowery Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hull v. D. Irvin Transport Ltd.Montana Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re Hardy's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1958
- State Ex Rel. Furshong v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1937
- Everett v. MillerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
- Hull v. D. Irvin Transport Ltd.Montana Supreme Court · 1984