Legal Opinion

Gerhard & Hey Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 25, 1943No. 5875; Entry No. 50291, etcPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kincheloe, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement, all of which were consolidated for the purposes of trial by consent of the parties, involve determination of the proper dutiable value of certain books imported at the port of New York. In reappraisement 139877-A, the merchandise was exported from England. The merchandise covered by all of the remaining cases involve exportations from France.

In each case the appraiser advanced the value and made his appraisement upon the basis of foreign value. Plaintiff claims that there is no foreign value, export value, or United States value, as those…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  2. Sartor v. BolingerTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Meyer v. WitterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gerhard & Hey Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
  2. Gerhard & Hey Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API